Showing posts with label desktop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label desktop. Show all posts

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Gnome 3 and Gnome Shell - Why reality has to be accepted

I had made my rants organist Gnome Shell, as with Unity. I thought moving out of Gnome 2, an unnecessary adventure. I still believe that users should be left at peace with the tools and interfaces they are used to instead of asking them to worry every six months to adjust to new interfaces and user experiences. After all, users should have the ease to do what they want to do in a PC or a laptop - write an document, create a presentation, manage personnel finance, do image creation and editing, code a piece of software, browse the web, manage their chats and communications etc, etc.

I am basically that sort of an user. I expect that my creative impulses should not be drowned by a volley of OS or DM related maintenance tasks. I do indulge in maintaining OS and the computer. I like to have my PC running the latest version of everything, all patches applied with nothing potentially left for a cracker to crack. Not that I have a lot to hide, except maybe my passwords. I don't want a wannabe explorer to lock me out of my on-line accounts.

Giving freedom to user to pursue her volitions in whatever manner she feels right, or what she feels comfortable is of one of the freedoms that should be guaranteed. Unless, security is a major factor, this should be sought to be ensured by any ope source project. I, as a controller of a software ecosystem -such as the Linux Kernel community or the FSF – should not seek to dictate which software or platform I should be using, based on biased views on the project preferences.

I had this hate – love relationship with Gnome 3 / Gnome Shell due to the fact that I felt it was threatening my basic freedom to choose. It was questioning my freedom to use software tools, I was was long accustomed of using in the name of moving forward. I was simply unacceptable at that point of time – a typical case of user inertia. An inertia, borne form the realization that I will have learn and adjust to new work-flows from now hence forth.

I had a choice to use Gnome Shell or move back to KDE, an environment I had left back long ago. Alternative was to choose a few non – production ready Unity, MATE and Cinnamon. The latter three are still non-production ready, though good progress have been done with the development of each of them. Only Gnome Shell and KDE could be touted as fairly stable DMs, that could satisfy the demands of users who want rock-solid systems, that don't interfere regressively with their day-to-day tasks.

Major mainline distos like Fedora and OpenSUSE have decided to make a happy living with Gnome 3. Ubuntu was disenchanted, and decided to have their on Unity, which helped driving a lot of users away. Linux Mint, mulled and came with MGSE -an instant success - which they quickly abandoned in favor of MATE and Cinnamon With Linux Mint 13, they are unable to decide which is their main system. I predict that this is going to be disaster for LM users, and they are going to be driven out fast. Abandoning an mass-favorite like MGSE could turn out to be the biggest folly from the LM stable.

Ububtu, is sort of recovering from it Unity folly. It is now targeting something that is that will be Gnome Shellish in their 12.10 avatar. If that happens, and if that is effective, it will be a welcome development for all the Ubuntu fans, LM users included.

I also did rant against the gate-crashing of touch screen devices. But of it holds true today. But with the device prices crashing – you have Kindle Fire for $200 – users can now have the luxury to chose between a device of content creation (PC / Laptop) and content delivery (tablet). I too came to own a tablet, apart form a smart phone today. Both to little to help out with my content creation tasks, even write out a longish e-mail. Touch interfaces are taking over laptops, and maybe I will also end up with touch screen laptop a few years down the line. So, user interfaces have to evolve.

Linux Distros will have realize that Gnome Shell is the way forward. Hanging on to the past with MATE and Chinnom is esapism. KDE is not the main DM of any of the popular distros. Gnome 3 / Gnome Shell is what we have and popular distros will have to make a choice now. This choice is going to be difficult. But it will make or kill the Linux OS.

Gnome Shell extensions do break with very upgrade, and often you are left with a most basic DM. Ubuntu's decision to embrace Gnome Shell seems to offer some hope for us users. But, ultimately all users will look forward for an hassle free DM!

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Clash of Desktop Environments: Unity, Gnome 3 or KDE 4?

Discussion threads are abuzz with the advantages and cons vis-a-vis Ubuntu Unity Vs Gnome 3 Shell. Being a Linux Mint 10 user, I was waiting for some news on what Linux Mint will chose for the next release (LM 11). I was a bit disappointed when LM 11 choose not to embrace either of them. For the time being Gnome 2 will be continued. I can live with that with my PC for some time, but meanwhile I thought about buying a new laptop. I would like to have the cutting edge Linux OS for the new laptop, and perhaps Linux Mint 11 would be a no go, though touted as very good otherwise.

 

Linux Mint desktop

Linux Mint 11 rejects both Gnome 3 and Unity for now 

 

There has been a bit of bile venting on both sides, but Gnome 3 seemed to have weathered out pretty well. It has been refered to as 'simple to the extreme' with 'some new features, but not much'. Others call call Gnome 3 'evolutionary', but Unity a 'toy for netbooks'.  Meanwhile, Ubuntustudio, one of the distros I breifly considered as a poosible laptop candidate moved in to quickly announce that they are adopting XFCE, rather that grapple with Unity or Gnome 3. Linux Mint project, the grape vine goes, is moving closer to Debian.

Linux Mint, as it turns out, might have a good point here. While Gnome 3 is quite stable, same it not the case with Unity. It seems to crash a lot or not work most of the time. Fedora 15 seems to run fine with Gnome 3 , whereas Ubuntu 11.04 with Unity is facing a tough time. Unity do have some support, especially the way its menu is bult. Others feel Unity is quite fine and well suited for newbie Linux users. Some feels that Gnome 3 is more responsive, logical and easy

When it comes to Gnome 3 Vs KDE 4.6, users complain the lack of flexibility in Gnome 3. KDE still looks a lot like Windows 97 and may not appeal a lot for those who like a less Windowish experience. I was a long time user of KDE on SUSE, when I was trying to appeal to new converts from Windows. Now that era being behind me, I have to fight the Mac crowd now. Anything different appeals.

Unity is based on Gnome 2 as of now, but will switch over to Gnome 3 with the next release. I have a feeing that both will start look alike after a few months. So Ubuntu should have gone with Gnome 3, rather than creating a fork, which is not a lot different. It will be worthwhile to test all the DEs from live DVDs or USBs and see how things work for you. 

There have been issues with performance and bugs with both the DEs. Unity seems to be a power drainer for the laptops. Both are moving into Windows Mac 'give-users no-flexibility pardigm' to keep them dump to the extent possible. The purported move towards touch interfaces motivates some of the new features, but only a few will like to type on glass as of now. 

Best choice at the moment therfore seems to be to stick with Gnome 2 or shift to KDE 4.6. XFCE is also turning out to be a top contenter. Or else continue with Linux Mint, which will remain faithful to Gnome 2 atleast till the next release. By the end of the year hopefully Gnome 3 and Unity may improve its useability and performance.

Further reading:

Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal Reviewed: This is My Favorite Ubuntu EVER!

Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Reactions from Users